A re-evaluation

Ironically, a clarification is needed on the last post of two clarifications. I possibly made the mistake of rendering historical forms of fascist politics, Fascism, as 'primarily ignored.' This was a misrepresentation of the project, as such a remark may seem against the original declaration of the project. I should not have phrased it this way. My aim, rather, is to attack the question of fascism with those historical forms in mind, and in historical analysis, but look, as well, at more abstract considerations of the mechanics of fascist politics, or how politics is/can be, in many ways, fascist. We are looking at the molecular, not the molar, as Deleuze and Guattari say.